The Strange Hadith
ISLAMIC POLEMICS SERIES • ARTICLE 21
The Strange Hadith
A Catalogue of Islam’s Most Embarrassing Traditions—From Camel Urine to Adult Breastfeeding
Extended Read
① THE ARGUMENT: WHAT IT IS AND WHY IT MATTERS
Every religious tradition has material its adherents find difficult. Christianity has the imprecatory psalms. Judaism has the herem passages. Mormonism has the Book of Abraham. What distinguishes Islam’s embarrassing-hadith problem is twofold: first, the hadith in question are not marginal traditions from obscure sources—they are found in Sahih al-Bukhari and Sahih Muslim, the two collections that Sunni Islam regards as the most rigorously authenticated books after the Qur’an. Second, they are not merely theologically awkward; they are medically bizarre, sexually explicit, and in some cases so at odds with basic human dignity that Muslim scholars themselves have spent centuries trying to explain them away.
This article is not about mockery. It is about accountability. Islam claims that its hadith literature preserves the divinely guided words and practices of the final prophet of God. If that claim is true, then these traditions represent the instructions and example of a man whose every action was either divinely commanded or divinely approved. They must be defended on those terms. If the claim is false—if these traditions are instead the accumulated folklore, cultural practices, and hagiographic embellishments of a pre-modern Arabian society—then the hadith system that authenticated them has a reliability problem that extends far beyond the strange material catalogued here.
THE DILEMMA
If these hadith are authentic:
They represent the divinely guided example of God’s final prophet.
Every tradition must be defended as wise, beneficial, and worthy of emulation.
If these hadith are inauthentic:
The authentication system that certified them as “sahih” (sound) has failed.
And if it failed here, it may have failed for the hadith Islam depends on for prayer, law, and daily practice.
② THE ISLAMIC DEFENSE
Context is everything. Many of these hadith reflect seventh-century Arabian medical knowledge, cultural norms, and social practices. Judging them by twenty-first-century Western standards is anachronistic. Camel urine was used medicinally across the ancient Near East. Adult breastfeeding established kinship ties in a tribal society where such ties meant survival. These practices made sense within their original context and were never intended as universal prescriptions for all times and places.
The hadith record Muhammad’s humanity, not his divinity. Unlike Christianity, which claims Jesus was God incarnate, Islam explicitly teaches that Muhammad was a human being (Surah 18:110). Human beings have bodies, physical functions, and cultural practices. The hadith honestly recording Muhammad’s full humanity—including bodily functions and domestic life—is a sign of the tradition’s integrity, not its weakness.
Modern science has in some cases vindicated these traditions. Studies have found antimicrobial properties in camel urine. Nigella sativa (black seed) has documented health benefits. The fly-wing hadith has been connected to research on antimicrobial compounds found on insect wings. What seems bizarre to the uninformed may reflect prophetic knowledge ahead of its time.
Polemicists cherry-pick and decontextualise. Critics like David Wood select the most sensational hadith, strip them of context, and present them to Western audiences for shock value. This is not scholarship; it is propaganda. The vast majority of hadith deal with prayer, charity, ethics, family life, and community governance—material that is unremarkable and edifying.
Some of these hadith are misrepresented or mistranslated. The “thighing” claim, for instance, has no sahih hadith basis and is a polemical fabrication or distortion. The “cross-dressing” claim involves a mistranslation of the word “lihaf” (blanket/cover) as “garment.” Careful scholarship resolves many of these apparent embarrassments.
The principle of adab (propriety) governs how these hadith are taught. Muslim scholars do not hide these traditions, but they teach them within a framework of respect for the Prophet and attention to scholarly context. Dumping them raw onto social media without that framework is an act of disrespect, not an act of education.
③ THE SOURCES: A CATEGORISED CATALOGUE
What follows is a systematic catalogue of the most frequently cited embarrassing hadith, organised by category, with full source references. Every hadith cited below is either sahih (authenticated) or hasan (good) by mainstream Sunni hadith scholars unless otherwise noted. The tradition’s own classification system is used throughout.
CATEGORY A: MEDICAL AND HYGIENE TRADITIONS
| Hadith | Source | Text (Summary) | Classification |
|---|---|---|---|
| Camel urine as medicine | Bukhari 5686; Muslim 1671a | People from the ‘Ukl tribe came to Medina and fell ill. Muhammad prescribed drinking camel milk and camel urine as a cure. They did so and recovered. (They later apostatised, killed the camel herder, and were punished with mutilation.) | Sahih (Bukhari & Muslim) |
| The fly-wing hadith | Bukhari 3320, 5782 | "If a fly falls in the drink of anyone of you, he should dip it completely in the drink and then throw it away, for in one of its wings there is a disease and in the other there is healing." | Sahih (Bukhari) |
| Black seed cures all diseases | Bukhari 5687, 5688; Muslim 2215 | "Use the black seed, for indeed it contains a cure for every disease except death." | Sahih (Bukhari & Muslim) |
| Fever is from the heat of Hell | Bukhari 3263, 5723; Muslim 2209 | "Fever is from the heat of Hell, so cool it with water." | Sahih (Bukhari & Muslim) |
| The evil eye is real | Bukhari 5740; Muslim 2187 | "The evil eye is a fact." Muhammad endorsed ruqya (incantations) as treatment for the evil eye. | Sahih (Bukhari & Muslim) |
| No contagious disease (then exceptions) | Bukhari 5757; Muslim 2220, 2221 | "There is no ‘adwa (contagion)." But also: "Flee from the leper as you would from a lion" (Bukhari 5707). And: "Do not put a sick one with a sound one" (Muslim 2221). | Sahih (contradictory hadith in same collections) |
| Dates protect against poison and magic | Muslim 2047 | "He who eats seven ‘Ajwa dates every morning will not be affected by poison or magic on that day." | Sahih (Muslim) |
| Drinking zamzam water cures what it is drunk for | Ahmad 14435; Ibn Majah 3062 | "The water of zamzam is for whatever it is drunk for." | Hasan (some scholars grade sahih) |
THE CONTAGION CONTRADICTION
Muhammad said “there is no contagion” (Bukhari 5757)—denying that diseases spread from person to person. But he also said “flee from the leper” (Bukhari 5707) and “do not put a sick one with a sound one” (Muslim 2221). Both positions are recorded in sahih hadith. Islamic scholars have spent centuries attempting to harmonise these, typically by arguing that disease does not spread independently (only by Allah’s will) but that one should take precautions anyway. This is a distinction without a practical difference—and the flat denial of contagion, if applied literally, has public-health consequences.
CATEGORY B: PURITY, URINE, AND BODILY-FUNCTION TRADITIONS
| Hadith | Source | Text (Summary) | Classification |
|---|---|---|---|
| Muhammad urinated standing up | Bukhari 224, 226; Muslim 273 | Hudhaifa reported that Muhammad went to a refuse dump and urinated while standing. Hudhaifa stood nearby and shielded him. Muhammad then performed wudu. | Sahih (Bukhari & Muslim) |
| Prohibition of facing/turning back to the qiblah while urinating | Bukhari 144, 394; Muslim 264 | "Do not face the qiblah when urinating or defecating, and do not turn your back to it." Detailed rules governing the direction one faces during excretion. | Sahih (Bukhari & Muslim) |
| Three stones for istinja (cleaning after defecation) | Muslim 262; Abu Dawud 40 | "When any one of you goes to relieve himself, he should take three stones with which to clean himself, for they will be enough for him." Not to use bones or dung. | Sahih (Muslim) |
| Bones and dung are food for jinn | Muslim 450; Bukhari 3860 | Muhammad explained the prohibition on using bones and dung for cleaning: "They are food of your brothers among the jinn." | Sahih (Muslim & Bukhari) |
| The urine of baby boys vs. girls | Abu Dawud 376; Ibn Majah 522; Bukhari 223 | "The urine of a baby boy should be sprinkled over, and the urine of a baby girl should be washed." Different purity rules based on the sex of the infant. | Sahih / Hasan |
| Companions drinking Muhammad’s ablution water | Bukhari 187, 189; Muslim 503 | "There was no water remaining from the ablution of the Prophet except they took it. When the Prophet performed ablution, they would rush to take the water." Companions competed to obtain water that had touched Muhammad’s body. | Sahih (Bukhari & Muslim) |
| Companions collecting Muhammad’s spit and mucus | Bukhari 2731 (Treaty of Hudaybiyyah account) | Urwa ibn Mas’ud observed: "Whenever the Messenger of Allah spat, the spit would fall in the hand of one of them who would rub it on his face and skin." | Sahih (Bukhari) |
| Prohibition of urinating in stagnant water | Bukhari 239; Muslim 281 | "None of you should urinate in stagnant water and then use it for bathing." | Sahih |
THE VENERATION-OF-FLUIDS PATTERN
Multiple sahih hadith record the companions collecting Muhammad’s ablution water (Bukhari 187, 189), his spit (Bukhari 2731), his sweat (Muslim 2331—Umm Sulaym collected his sweat to mix with perfume), his blood (reported in various sources—Abdullah ibn al-Zubayr reportedly drank Muhammad’s cupping blood), and possibly his urine (some reports in non-sahih sources). This is not a single isolated incident; it is a pattern of veneration of the prophet’s bodily fluids that the tradition records approvingly. Islamic scholars defend this as reflecting the companions’ love for Muhammad and the barakah (blessing) in his person. Critics observe that this level of bodily-fluid veneration has no parallel in any other Abrahamic prophetic tradition and raises questions about the boundary between reverence and cultism.
CATEGORY C: SEXUAL AND MARITAL TRADITIONS
| Hadith | Source | Text (Summary) | Classification |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adult breastfeeding (rada’a al-kabir) | Muslim 1453a, 1453b; Abu Dawud 2061; Muwatta 30.12 | Sahla bint Suhayl complained to Muhammad that her husband Abu Hudhaifa was jealous of their freedman Salim entering their house. Muhammad said: "Breastfeed him and you will become unlawful to him." She said: "He has a beard!" Muhammad smiled and said: "I know he has a beard." She breastfed him, and Abu Hudhaifa’s jealousy ceased. Aisha later extended this ruling generally; other wives of the Prophet disagreed and considered it specific to Sahla. | Sahih (Muslim) |
| Aisha’s age at consummation | Bukhari 5133, 5134; Muslim 1422 | "The Prophet married her when she was six years old and consummated the marriage when she was nine years old, and then she remained with him for nine years." | Sahih (Bukhari & Muslim). Covered in Article 09. |
| Muhammad’s sexual stamina | Bukhari 268; Anas narration | "The Prophet used to visit all his wives in one night, and he had nine wives at that time." Some narrations add: "He was given the strength of thirty men." | Sahih (Bukhari) |
| The requirement of ghusl after penetration even without ejaculation | Muslim 349; Bukhari 291 | "When the circumcised parts meet (and the tip disappears), ghusl becomes obligatory." This implies normative circumcision for women as well as men in some readings. | Sahih (Muslim & Bukhari) |
| Coitus interruptus (‘azl) and slave women | Bukhari 2229; Muslim 1438 | Companions practised withdrawal with female captives and asked Muhammad about it. He did not prohibit it, saying: "There is no soul that is destined to exist but will come into existence." | Sahih (Bukhari & Muslim) |
| Temporary marriage (mut’ah) | Bukhari 5115-5119; Muslim 1404-1406 | Companions practised temporary marriage during military campaigns with Muhammad’s permission. Later abrogated (according to Sunni view; Shia still permit it). | Sahih (debated on abrogation) |
| Angels curse a woman who refuses her husband at night | Bukhari 3237; Muslim 1436 | "If a man calls his wife to his bed and she refuses, and he sleeps angry with her, the angels will curse her until morning." | Sahih (Bukhari & Muslim) |
THE ADULT BREASTFEEDING DEBATE (MUSLIM 1453)
This is one of the most internally contested traditions in Islamic scholarship. The hadith is in Sahih Muslim—the second most rigorously authenticated collection.
The core problem: Muhammad instructed a woman to breastfeed an adult man with a beard to establish a mahram (unmarriageable kin) relationship so he could freely enter her home. Aisha reportedly adopted this as a general ruling and would instruct her nieces to breastfeed adult men she wanted to be able to visit her. The other wives of the Prophet refused to accept this as a general practice (Muslim 1453b).
Muslim scholars’ responses: (1) The majority position (Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi’i, Hanbali) limits it to Sahla’s specific case and does not generalise it. (2) Some scholars argue the “breastfeeding” was symbolic (she expressed milk into a cup and the man drank it) rather than direct physical nursing. (3) The hadith is sahih in grading but its ruling is considered by most to be specific and non-transferable. However, it remains in Sahih Muslim, graded sahih, and Aisha—the Prophet’s wife and one of Islam’s premier hadith authorities—applied it generally.
CATEGORY D: REVELATION AND THE PROPHET’S DOMESTIC LIFE
| Hadith | Source | Text (Summary) | Classification |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revelation in Aisha’s garments/bedding | Bukhari 3775, 2442; Muslim 2441 | "The revelation does not come to me when I am in the garment [or under the cover/lihaf] of any of my wives except Aisha." Hadith scholars debate whether lihaf means garment, blanket, or bed-cover. | Sahih (Bukhari & Muslim) |
| Aisha washed semen from Muhammad’s garments | Bukhari 229, 230, 232; Muslim 289 | "I used to wash the semen off the garment of the Prophet, and he would go out for prayer with water spots still visible on it." Also: "I used to scrape it off with my fingernail." | Sahih (Bukhari & Muslim) |
| Muhammad’s favourite wife and divine favouritism | Bukhari 2581; Muslim 2442 | When asked where revelation comes, Muhammad repeatedly privileged Aisha. Companions would time their gifts to Muhammad’s visits to Aisha’s apartment, hoping for prophetic favour. Other wives complained. | Sahih (Bukhari & Muslim) |
| Muhammad and Aisha bathed from same vessel | Bukhari 250, 261; Muslim 321 | "The Prophet and I used to take a bath from a single water container." Detailed descriptions of shared bathing. | Sahih (Bukhari & Muslim) |
| Aisha: “Your Lord hastens in fulfilling your wishes” | Bukhari 4788 | When Muhammad received a revelation permitting him to do something he desired, Aisha remarked: “I feel that your Lord hastens in fulfilling your wishes and desires.” This comment, preserved in the sahih tradition, records the observation of the Prophet’s own wife that revelations conveniently aligned with his personal desires. | Sahih (Bukhari) |
THE “LIHAF” DEBATE — GARMENT OR BLANKET?
The Arabic word lihaf in Bukhari 3775 can mean a garment, a blanket, a cover, or bedding. Muslim apologists argue that critics mistranslate this as “garment” (implying Muhammad wore Aisha’s clothing) when it actually means “under the same blanket” or “in her bed” (a reference to intimacy, not cross-dressing). This is a legitimate linguistic point. However, other narrations (e.g., Bukhari 2442, Muslim 2441) use the phrase fi thawb—“in the garment of”—which is harder to explain as “blanket.” The tradition itself is not uniform in its wording, and the strongest narrations do use clothing language. Muslim scholars who address this typically argue that being “in the garment” means under Aisha’s cover while reclining, not wearing her dress. The polemic charge of “cross-dressing” overstates what the hadith says, but the hadith does tie divine revelation to physical proximity with a specific woman’s clothing or bedding—which raises its own questions about the nature of the revelatory experience.
CATEGORY E: PHYSICAL DESCRIPTIONS AND UNUSUAL PRACTICES
| Hadith | Source | Text (Summary) | Classification |
|---|---|---|---|
| Muhammad’s sweat collected as perfume | Muslim 2331 | Umm Sulaym used to collect Muhammad’s sweat and mix it with perfume. Muhammad asked what she was doing; she said: “It is your sweat; we mix it in our perfume, and it is the best perfume.” | Sahih (Muslim) |
| Cupping blood reportedly consumed | Tabrani; Abu Ya’la (weaker chains); Ibn Hajar discusses | Reports that Abdullah ibn al-Zubayr drank Muhammad’s cupping blood and Muhammad said “Woe to you from the people and woe to the people from you” (or similar). Chains debated; some scholars accept, others reject. | Disputed (some chains hasan, many weak) |
| Muhammad’s description: ruddy-white, sweated profusely | Bukhari 3547-3552; Muslim 2330-2340 | Extensive physical descriptions: “neither very white nor very brown,” large hands and feet, sweated profusely, described in highly laudatory physical terms by companions. | Sahih (Bukhari & Muslim) |
| The seal of prophethood | Muslim 2346; Bukhari 3541 | A physical mark between Muhammad’s shoulder blades, described variously as a “mole,” “a pigeon’s egg,” or “a swelling like a button.” Companions touched and kissed it. | Sahih (Muslim & Bukhari) |
| Dyeing hair and beards | Bukhari 3462, 5899; Muslim 2103 | Muhammad instructed followers to dye grey hair and beards, specifically not to use black dye. He used henna and other colouring. | Sahih (Bukhari & Muslim) |
| Prohibition of silk and gold for men; Muhammad’s exceptions | Bukhari 5828-5835; Muslim 2069-2076 | Silk and gold prohibited for Muslim men but permitted for women. Some narrations suggest Muhammad held silk in one hand and gold in the other and said: “These two are prohibited for the males of my ummah.” Yet accounts of his own luxurious garments exist. | Sahih (Bukhari & Muslim) |
| The al-Zutt hadith: tall, dark people are descendants of Ham | Various compilations, weaker chains | Reports describing the al-Zutt (Jat people of South Asia) as tall, dark, and sometimes linking them to racial categorisations derived from the Curse of Ham narrative. Used in Islamic ethnographic traditions. | Mostly weak chains; the racial-curse element is rejected by most scholars |
| Satan sleeps in the nose | Bukhari 3295; Muslim 238 | "When any one of you wakes up from sleep, he should wash his nose by putting water in it and blowing it out three times, for Satan spends the night in the upper part of one’s nose." | Sahih (Bukhari & Muslim) |
| Yawning is from Satan | Bukhari 3289; Muslim 2994 | "Yawning is from Satan, so if any of you yawns, he should try to suppress it as much as possible." | Sahih (Bukhari & Muslim) |
| Dogs nullify prayer; black dogs are devils | Muslim 510; Abu Dawud 702 | "Prayer is annulled by a woman, a donkey, and a black dog." When asked what distinguishes a black dog: "The black dog is a devil." | Sahih (Muslim) |
| Kill all dogs (later modified to only some) | Muslim 1572; Bukhari 3323 | Muhammad ordered the killing of dogs. This was later modified to permit keeping dogs for hunting, herding, and farming, but general killing orders are recorded. | Sahih |
| Stars are missiles against demons | Qur’an 67:5, 37:6-10; tafsir traditions | Shooting stars are projectiles hurled at jinn who try to eavesdrop on heavenly conversations. Supported by tafsir and hadith explanations of the Qur’anic verses. | Sahih in terms of tafsir attestation |
THE RACIAL-CATEGORISATION TRADITIONS
Islamic tradition contains a body of ethnographic hadith and athar (companion reports) that categorise peoples by descent from Noah’s sons: Shem (Semitic peoples), Ham (African and dark-skinned peoples), and Japheth (lighter-skinned and northern peoples). The al-Zutt traditions fit within this framework. While the Qur’an itself does not contain racial hierarchy (Surah 49:13 affirms that the most honoured are the most God-conscious), the hadith and early Islamic historical traditions absorbed Near Eastern racial-genealogical frameworks that included pejorative descriptions of dark-skinned peoples. Most modern Muslim scholars reject these traditions as weak or culturally contaminated. However, they were widely cited in classical Islamic scholarship and contributed to the theological justification for the Arab slave trade in sub-Saharan Africa, which is documented in Article 16 of this series.
CATEGORY F: MISCELLANEOUS STRANGE TRADITIONS
| Hadith | Source | Text (Summary) | Classification |
|---|---|---|---|
| Do not eat with the left hand—Satan eats with his left | Muslim 2020; Abu Dawud 3776 | "None of you should eat with his left hand or drink with his left hand, for the Satan eats with his left hand and drinks with his left hand." | Sahih (Muslim) |
| If you see a bad dream, spit to your left three times | Bukhari 3292; Muslim 2261 | "If anyone of you sees a dream that he does not like, he should spit on his left side three times and seek refuge with Allah from Satan." | Sahih (Bukhari & Muslim) |
| Eclipses happen because of death/fear | Bukhari 1040-1041; Muslim 901 | "The sun and the moon are two signs amongst the signs of Allah. They do not eclipse because of the death of someone." (This corrects a pre-Islamic belief but still prescribes prayer during eclipses as the solution.) | Sahih |
| Adam was 60 cubits tall | Bukhari 3326; Muslim 2841 | "Allah created Adam in his form, his length being sixty cubits" (~90 feet / ~27 metres). | Sahih (Bukhari & Muslim) |
| Women are deficient in mind and religion | Bukhari 304, 1462; Muslim 79 | "I have not seen anyone more deficient in intelligence and religion than you [women]." The deficiency in intelligence is explained by the testimony of two women equalling one man; deficiency in religion by the inability to pray during menstruation. | Sahih (Bukhari & Muslim) |
| The majority of Hell’s inhabitants are women | Bukhari 304, 3241; Muslim 2737 | Muhammad said he saw into Hell and “the majority of its inhabitants were women.” | Sahih (Bukhari & Muslim) |
| A child resembles whichever parent’s fluid dominates | Bukhari 3329; Muslim 315 | "The child resembles whichever of its parents’ fluid dominates the other." Used to explain why children resemble fathers or mothers. | Sahih (Bukhari & Muslim) |
| Earth was created on Saturday; Adam on Friday | Muslim 2789 | Describes creation of earth over seven days starting Saturday, with Adam created on Friday. (Contradicts Qur’anic creation in six days; some scholars consider the hadith to be from Israelite traditions.) | Sahih (Muslim)—though disputed by some as Isra’iliyyat |
④ ISLAMIC DOCUMENTATION AND ARGUMENTS AGAINST THE CRITICAL CLAIMS
The “thighing” claim has no sahih basis. The specific claim that Muhammad practised “thighing” (mufa’khadha) with Aisha before consummation has no chain of narration in Bukhari, Muslim, or any of the six canonical collections. It originates from a Shia-attributed fatwa (sometimes attributed to Khomeini) and has been projected back onto the hadith corpus by polemicists. This is a genuine case of fabrication by critics, and it should be acknowledged honestly.
The lihaf/garment hadith is genuinely ambiguous. As noted in the callout above, the Arabic is ambiguous enough that “under the same bedcover” is a defensible translation. The polemic rendering of this as “cross-dressing” is an overstatement. Muslim scholars have addressed this for centuries and the consensus does not support the “wearing women’s clothing” interpretation.
Modern scientific research supports some claims. Nigella sativa (black seed) has documented antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial properties (review in Journal of Ethnopharmacology). Camel urine has shown some antimicrobial activity in laboratory studies (Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences). While these do not validate the claim of “cure for every disease,” they demonstrate that the traditions are not pure fantasy.
The adult-breastfeeding hadith is restricted by scholarly consensus. As noted, the overwhelming majority of scholars across all four Sunni madhabs restrict this to Sahla’s specific case. It was never meant as a general ruling. Presenting it as standard Islamic practice misrepresents 1,400 years of jurisprudential consensus.
The “contagion contradiction” has sophisticated harmonisations. Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani, in Fath al-Bari, harmonises the “no contagion” hadith with the “flee from the leper” hadith by explaining that disease does not spread autonomously (independently of Allah’s will) but that taking precautions is part of the means (asbab) Allah has created. This is a theological position about causation, not a denial of observable disease transmission.
The racial-categorisation traditions are mostly weak. The al-Zutt traditions and Curse-of-Ham narratives that circulate in hadith collections are mostly graded weak (da’if) by hadith scholars. The Qur’an’s own position (49:13) explicitly rejects racial hierarchy. Attributing racial theories to Islam on the basis of weak hadith is unfair to the tradition’s own internal standards.
⑤ THE PROBLEM WITH THE ISLAMIC RESPONSE
The context defence proves too much. If these hadith reflect seventh-century Arabian culture rather than divine guidance, then the same could be true of any hadith. The Qur’an instructs Muslims to follow Muhammad’s example (Surah 33:21: “There has certainly been for you in the Messenger of Allah an excellent pattern”). If the camel-urine hadith is culturally contextual and not a universal prescription, how do we determine which of Muhammad’s practices are universal and which are cultural? The tradition does not provide a reliable method for making this distinction. Every hadith has a cultural context. If cultural context can neutralise the embarrassing ones, it can neutralise the important ones too.
The scientific-vindication claims do not hold up under scrutiny. Finding antimicrobial compounds in camel urine does not validate prescribing it as medicine. Urine also contains urea, creatinine, bacteria, and potential pathogens. Laboratory antimicrobial activity does not translate to safe therapeutic use. The WHO has warned against drinking camel urine due to MERS-CoV transmission risk. As for the black seed: demonstrating that Nigella sativa has some health benefits is not the same as validating the claim that it cures “every disease except death.” The hadith makes a universal therapeutic claim that is demonstrably false. Black seed does not cure cancer, diabetes, heart disease, or malaria. Saying “it has some benefits” does not rescue “it cures everything.” Similarly, finding some antimicrobial compounds on insect wings does not validate dipping a fly in your drink and then consuming it. The claim that the “healing wing” counteracts the “disease wing” has no support in entomology.
The adult-breastfeeding restriction does not eliminate the problem. The fact that the majority limited the ruling to Sahla’s case is a jurisprudential solution, not a historical one. The hadith is sahih. It is in Muslim’s collection. It records Muhammad instructing a woman to breastfeed an adult man. The question is not “do modern scholars apply this ruling generally?” (they mostly don’t). The question is “did the prophet of God instruct a woman to breastfeed a grown man with a beard to solve a domestic jealousy problem?” If yes, this is the divinely guided example of the final prophet. If no, a sahih hadith in Muslim is fabricated—and the authentication system has failed.
The contagion harmonisation is a theological assertion, not a scientific one. Saying “diseases don’t spread independently of Allah’s will but you should still avoid lepers” may be theologically coherent, but the original hadith—“there is no contagion” (la ’adwa)—is a flat denial of the concept. The harmonisation is a sophisticated rescue operation applied to a statement that, read naturally, denies that diseases spread. If Muhammad meant “diseases spread but only by Allah’s will,” why did he say “there is no contagion”? The rescue interpretation reads into the text something that the text does not say.
The “cherry-picking” defence is a deflection, not a rebuttal. Saying critics “only pick the embarrassing hadith” does not explain the embarrassing hadith. The question is not whether the tradition also contains edifying material (it obviously does). The question is whether these specific traditions—authenticated by Islam’s own scholars, preserved in Islam’s most authoritative collections—represent the words and example of God’s final prophet. Every tradition has edifying material. Not every tradition has sahih-graded instructions to drink camel urine, dip flies in beverages, and breastfeed adult men.
The bodily-fluid veneration pattern has no prophetic parallel. The companions collecting Muhammad’s ablution water, spit, sweat, and possibly blood and urine creates a pattern of physical veneration that has no parallel in any other Abrahamic prophetic tradition. No disciple collected Jesus’ spit. No Israelite preserved Moses’ sweat. The tradition presents this approvingly, as evidence of the companions’ devotion. But devotion is not the question. The question is whether this pattern—endorsed by the prophet and recorded approvingly in sahih collections—reflects divine prophetic guidance or the development of a personality cult around a charismatic leader.
The “thighing” concession does not rescue the rest. It is important to acknowledge that the specific “thighing” claim lacks sahih support—critics should not use it. But conceding one fabricated charge does not address the dozens of sahih-graded traditions catalogued above. The embarrassing-hadith problem is not a single weak claim that can be refuted. It is a systematic pattern across multiple categories—medical, sexual, hygienic, cosmological—all graded sahih, all in the most authoritative collections, all attributed to the final prophet of God.
THE CUMULATIVE PROBLEM
Islam’s two most authoritative hadith collections—Sahih al-Bukhari and Sahih Muslim—contain traditions prescribing camel urine as medicine, instructing believers to dip flies in their beverages, claiming black seed cures every disease, denying contagion while simultaneously warning against it, commanding adult breastfeeding to establish kinship, recording the collection and veneration of the prophet’s bodily fluids, declaring women deficient in intelligence and religion, identifying the majority of Hell’s inhabitants as women, placing Satan in noses and in yawns, declaring black dogs to be devils, and claiming Adam was ninety feet tall. Every one of these is graded sahih by Islam’s own authentication system. The Islamic response faces a dilemma from which there is no escape: if these hadith are authentic, they represent the divinely guided example of God’s final prophet, and they must be defended as wise, true, and worthy of emulation. If they are inauthentic, they passed through the most rigorous authentication system in Islamic scholarship and were certified as sound—which means the system is unreliable, and every hadith it certified (including those Islam depends on for prayer, law, and daily practice) is suspect. Islam cannot have it both ways. It cannot maintain that its authentication system is trustworthy while simultaneously explaining away the embarrassing traditions that system authenticated.
⑥ KEYS TO ADDRESS THIS IN A CONVERSATION
1. Do not lead with the strangest hadith. Starting a conversation with “did you know Muhammad said to dip a fly in your drink?” will feel like an ambush and shut down dialogue. Instead, start with the dilemma: “How do you decide which hadith are still applicable today and which were just cultural?” This frames the problem respectfully and invites your friend to think about it.
2. Acknowledge the thighing fabrication. If your Muslim friend raises it, agree: “You’re right—that specific claim doesn’t have sahih support, and it shouldn’t be used.” This builds credibility and shows you are interested in truth, not gotchas. Then pivot: “But these other hadith are sahih, and they’re in Bukhari and Muslim. How should we think about those?”
3. Use the dilemma, not mockery. “If the camel-urine hadith is authentic, it’s from God’s prophet. If it’s not, the system that certified it is broken. Which is it?” This is not a trick question. It is the genuine logical structure of the problem.
4. Focus on the contagion contradiction as the strongest case. The camel-urine and fly-dipping hadith can be dismissed as “cultural context.” The contagion contradiction is harder to escape because it involves two sahih hadith that flatly contradict each other—one denying contagion, one warning against it. Ask: “How can both be from the same prophet speaking under divine guidance?”
5. Use Aisha’s comment as the key to the revelation question. Bukhari 4788: “I feel that your Lord hastens in fulfilling your wishes and desires.” This is not a critic’s assessment. It is the observation of Muhammad’s own wife, preserved in his own tradition’s most authoritative collection. If Aisha noticed that revelations conveniently aligned with Muhammad’s desires, what does that suggest about the source of the revelations?
6. Contrast with Jesus gently. “When I read the Gospels, I see Jesus healing the sick, feeding the hungry, and touching lepers. I never see him prescribing urine, collecting spit, or instructing adult breastfeeding. The contrast is not about cultural context—both lived in pre-modern societies. The contrast is about what kind of example each left. Which one looks more like what God’s prophet would do?”
7. End with the reliability question. “The authentication system that graded the adult-breastfeeding hadith ‘sahih’ is the same system that graded the five-daily-prayers hadith ‘sahih.’ If the system got one wrong, how do we know it got the other right? Is there a more reliable foundation for knowing what God actually said? Christians believe there is: eyewitness accounts written within a generation of Jesus, preserved in thousands of manuscripts, and centred on a person whose life can be examined historically. Would you be willing to look at that evidence together?”
Sources and Further Reading
All hadith references are from standard published editions: Sahih al-Bukhari (Dar Tawq al-Najah ed.); Sahih Muslim (Dar Ihya’ al-Turath ed.); Sunan Abu Dawud; Muwatta Imam Malik; Musnad Ahmad. Numbering follows international hadith numbering systems (available at sunnah.com). For hadith sciences and authentication methodology: Ibn al-Salah, Muqaddimah; al-Nawawi, al-Taqrib; Ibn Hajar, Nuzhah al-Nazar. For the adult-breastfeeding jurisprudential debate: Ibn Hajar, Fath al-Bari, commentary on relevant sections; al-Nawawi, Sharh Sahih Muslim on 1453. For the contagion harmonisation: Ibn Hajar, Fath al-Bari on Bukhari 5757. For the lihaf/garment linguistic debate: Lane’s Lexicon; Ibn Hajar, Fath al-Bari on Bukhari 3775. For scientific assessment of camel urine and black seed: WHO MERS-CoV advisory; review articles in Journal of Ethnopharmacology on Nigella sativa; Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences on camel urine. For Christian engagement: David Wood, “The Muhammad You Didn’t Know” and “Fun Islamic Facts” series (Acts17Apologetics); Nabeel Qureshi, No God but One (Zondervan, 2016), ch. 6–7; James White, What Every Christian Needs to Know About the Qur’an (Bethany House, 2013).
• • •
• • •